RUNLOCALAIv38
->Will it run?Best GPUCompareTroubleshootStartLearnPulseModelsHardwareToolsBench
Run check
RUNLOCALAI

Independently operated catalog for local-AI hardware and software. Hand-written verdicts. Source-cited claims. Reproducible commands when we have them.

OP·Eruo Fredoline
DIR
  • Models
  • Hardware
  • Tools
  • Benchmarks
TOOLS
  • Will it run?
  • Compare hardware
  • Cost vs cloud
  • Choose my GPU
  • Prompting kits
  • Quick answers
REF
  • All buyer guides
  • Learn local AI
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Errors KB
  • Trust
EDITOR
  • About
  • Author
  • How we make money
  • Editorial policy
  • Contact
LEGAL
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Sitemap
MAIL · MONTHLY DIGEST
Get monthly local AI changes
Monthly recap. No spam.
DISCLOSURE

Some links on this site are affiliate links (Amazon Associates and other first-class retailers). When you buy through them, we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate links do not influence our verdicts — there are cards we rate highly that we don't have affiliate relationships with, and cards that sell well that we refuse to recommend. Read more →

© 2026 runlocalai.coIndependently operated
RUNLOCALAI · v38
Glossary / Training & optimization / Q5_K_M Quantization
Training & optimization

Q5_K_M Quantization

Q5_K_M is a mixed-precision GGUF quantization averaging ~5.7 bits per parameter. Attention and feed-forward weights use 6-bit K-quants, the rest use 5-bit, with per-block scales and importance-weighted matrices.

Q5_K_M is the practical sweet spot for users with enough VRAM to spare. A 7B model fits in ~5 GB and a 70B in ~50 GB. Perplexity vs FP16 is typically 0.05–0.15 points worse — visible on benchmarks but hard to feel in chat.

Pick Q5_K_M over Q4_K_M when you have headroom and the model is doing tasks where small errors compound (long-form writing, multi-turn coding). Pick Q4_K_M instead when VRAM is tight or the model is being used for chat where 0.1 PPL is invisible.

Practical example

An operator running a local writing-assistant workflow on a 24GB RTX 4090 has 20GB of headroom after loading a 32B model's KV cache needs, and is choosing between Q4_K_M and Q5_K_M for a long-form editing task where subtle wording errors compound across multiple drafts. At ~5.7 bits per parameter, Q5_K_M pushes the model to roughly 23GB — still fits with room for a modest context window — versus Q4_K_M's ~19GB. They run both on a multi-turn revision task and the Q5_K_M version holds consistent style and factual details across five rounds of edits where Q4_K_M occasionally drifts. Since VRAM isn't the binding constraint here, they ship Q5_K_M; on a smaller 12GB card running the same 32B model, that headroom wouldn't exist and Q4_K_M would be the only workable choice.

Related terms

QuantizationGGUFQ4_K_M Quantization

See also

tool: llama-cpptool: ollama

Reviewed by Eruo Fredoline. See our editorial policy.

Buyer guides
  • Best GPU for local AI →
When it doesn't work
  • Quantization quality loss →
  • GGUF tokenizer mismatch →