RUNLOCALAIv38
->Will it run?Best GPUCompareTroubleshootStartLearnPulseModelsHardwareToolsBench
Run check
RUNLOCALAI

Independently operated catalog for local-AI hardware and software. Hand-written verdicts. Source-cited claims. Reproducible commands when we have them.

OP·Fredoline Eruo
DIR
  • Models
  • Hardware
  • Tools
  • Benchmarks
TOOLS
  • Will it run?
  • Compare hardware
  • Cost vs cloud
  • Choose my GPU
  • Prompting kits
  • Quick answers
REF
  • All buyer guides
  • Learn local AI
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Errors KB
  • Trust
EDITOR
  • About
  • Author
  • How we make money
  • Editorial policy
  • Contact
LEGAL
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Sitemap
MAIL · MONTHLY DIGEST
Get monthly local AI changes
Monthly recap. No spam.
DISCLOSURE

Some links on this site are affiliate links (Amazon Associates and other first-class retailers). When you buy through them, we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate links do not influence our verdicts — there are cards we rate highly that we don't have affiliate relationships with, and cards that sell well that we refuse to recommend. Read more →

© 2026 runlocalai.coIndependently operated
RUNLOCALAI · v38
  1. >
  2. Home
  3. /Learn
  4. /Courses
  5. /Advanced NLP with Local Models
  6. /Ch. 9
Advanced NLP with Local Models

09. Multi-Document Summarization

Chapter 9 of 18 · 15 min
KEY INSIGHT

Multi-document summarization quality depends heavily on conflict detection and source attribution strategies. Without explicit policies for reconciling contradictory information, unified summaries risk presenting misleading consensus where significant disagreement exists.

Multi-document summarization synthesizes information across multiple sources into coherent, consolidated summaries. Unlike single-document tasks, cross-document aggregation must reconcile conflicting information, identify consensus positions, and avoid redundant coverage of shared content.

Conflict detection identifies contradictory claims across source documents. When sources disagree on facts, summarization strategies range from neutral presentation acknowledging uncertainty to preference weighting based on source credibility. System prompt engineering must specify conflict handling policies.

from typing import List, Dict
import ollama

def multi_doc_summarize(documents: List[str], model: str = "llama3") -> Dict:
    # Stage 1: Individual document processing
    doc_summaries = []
    for i, doc in enumerate(documents):
        prompt = f"""Summarize this document in 3-5 sentences.
        Focus on key facts, claims, and conclusions.
        
        Document {i+1}:
        {doc}
        
        Summary:"""
        response = ollama.generate(model=model, prompt=prompt)
        doc_summaries.append({
            'index': i,
            'summary': response['response']
        })
    
    # Stage 2: Cross-document synthesis
    synthesis_prompt = f"""Synthesize these {len(documents)} document summaries 
    into a unified multi-document summary.
    
    Requirements:
    - Consolidate overlapping information
    - Preserve source diversity where perspectives differ
    - Flag contradictory claims with source attribution
    - Present consensus positions prominently
    - Note areas where sources add unique information
    
    Summaries:"""
    
    for d in doc_summaries:
        synthesis_prompt += f"\n\nDocument {d['index']+1}: {d['summary']}"
    
    synthesis_prompt += "\n\nUnified Summary:"
    
    unified = ollama.generate(model=model, prompt=synthesis_prompt)
    
    return {
        'individual_summaries': doc_summaries,
        'unified_summary': unified['response']
    }

def cross_doc_entity_tracking(documents: List[str], model: str = "llama3") -> Dict:
    """Track entities across multiple documents for relation synthesis."""
    prompt = """Extract named entities and track their appearances across documents.
    Identify relationships that span multiple documents.
    
    Documents: """ + "\n---\n".join(documents)
    
    response = ollama.generate(model=model, prompt=prompt)
    return parse_entity_relations(response['response'])

Hierarchical summarization processes documents at multiple levels. Initial pass extracts entity mentions and key claims. Intermediate aggregation identifies document clusters sharing topics. Final synthesis constructs coherent narrative from cluster summaries. This pyramid approach scales to document collections impractical for single-pass processing.

Temporal reasoning addresses document collections spanning different time periods. Summaries must distinguish current information from historical context, flag information that may have aged out, and indicate when evidence supersedes earlier claims. Temporal tagging in source documents assists priority determination.

Source attribution in multi-document summaries preserves accountability. Citations linking summary claims to source documents enable verification and allow readers to explore source context. Attribution styles range from inline references to footnotes to hyperlinked entity mentions.

EXERCISE

Build a multi-document summarization system for news articles covering the same event. Implement conflict detection, temporal ordering, and source attribution. Evaluate coherence and factual consistency against human-annotated reference summaries.

← Chapter 8
Advanced Summarization
Chapter 10 →
Query-Focused Summarization