RUNLOCALAIv38
->Will it run?Best GPUCompareTroubleshootStartLearnPulseModelsHardwareToolsBench
Run check
RUNLOCALAI

Independently operated catalog for local-AI hardware and software. Hand-written verdicts. Source-cited claims. Reproducible commands when we have them.

OP·Eruo Fredoline
DIR
  • Models
  • Hardware
  • Tools
  • Benchmarks
TOOLS
  • Will it run?
  • Compare hardware
  • Cost vs cloud
  • Choose my GPU
  • Prompting kits
  • Quick answers
REF
  • All buyer guides
  • Learn local AI
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Errors KB
  • Trust
EDITOR
  • About
  • Author
  • How we make money
  • Editorial policy
  • Contact
LEGAL
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Sitemap
MAIL · MONTHLY DIGEST
Get monthly local AI changes
Monthly recap. No spam.
DISCLOSURE

Some links on this site are affiliate links (Amazon Associates and other first-class retailers). When you buy through them, we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate links do not influence our verdicts — there are cards we rate highly that we don't have affiliate relationships with, and cards that sell well that we refuse to recommend. Read more →

© 2026 runlocalai.coIndependently operated
RUNLOCALAI · v38
  1. >
  2. Home
  3. /Learn
  4. /Courses
  5. /Multi-Agent Systems
  6. /Ch. 21
Multi-Agent Systems

21. Multi-Agent Content Team

Chapter 21 of 24 · 15 min
KEY INSIGHT

Multi-agent content production uses staged pipelines with distinct responsibilities per agent, human checkpoints for quality control, and iteration loops for revision cycles.

A content team deployment coordinates specialized agents to produce high-quality written content. This architecture demonstrates orchestration patterns for creative work: research, drafting, review, and revision cycles managed by multiple agents with distinct responsibilities.

Team Structure

The content team consists of a Research Agent that gathers and synthesizes information, a Drafting Agent that transforms research into structured content, an Editor Agent that reviews for quality and consistency, and a Publishing Agent that formats and finalizes output.

Workflow Orchestration

The orchestrator manages the content pipeline: research → draft → review → revision → publish. Each stage may require human approval checkpoints depending on content risk levels.

# content_team/orchestrator.py
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Optional
from enum import Enum

class ContentStage(Enum):
    RESEARCH = "research"
    DRAFT = "draft"
    REVIEW = "review"
    REVISION = "revision"
    PUBLISH = "publish"

@dataclass
class ContentTask:
    task_id: str
    topic: str
    target_audience: str
    word_count_target: int
    current_stage: ContentStage = ContentStage.RESEARCH
    research_context: Optional[dict] = None
    draft_content: Optional[str] = None
    review_notes: Optional[str] = None
    revision_count: int = 0

class ContentTeamOrchestrator:
    def __init__(
        self,
        research_agent: any,
        drafting_agent: any,
        editor_agent: any,
        publishing_agent: any
    ):
        self.agents = {
            ContentStage.RESEARCH: research_agent,
            ContentStage.DRAFT: drafting_agent,
            ContentStage.REVIEW: editor_agent,
            ContentStage.PUBLISH: publishing_agent
        }
        self.max_revisions = 3
    
    async def process_content_request(self, task: ContentTask) -> dict:
        while task.current_stage != ContentStage.PUBLISH:
            agent = self.agents[task.current_stage]
            task = await self._execute_stage(agent, task)
            
            if task.current_stage == ContentStage.REVIEW:
                if self._needs_revision(task):
                    task = self._transition_to_revision(task)
                else:
                    task = self._transition_to_publish(task)
        
        return {"task_id": task.task_id, "content": task.draft_content}
    
    async def _execute_stage(self, agent, task: ContentTask) -> ContentTask:
        context = self._build_context(task)
        result = await agent.process(context)
        return self._apply_result(task, result)
    
    def _build_context(self, task: ContentTask) -> dict:
        return {
            "topic": task.topic,
            "audience": task.target_audience,
            "word_count": task.word_count_target,
            "research": task.research_context,
            "draft": task.draft_content,
            "review_notes": task.review_notes
        }
    
    def _needs_revision(self, task: ContentTask) -> bool:
        return task.review_notes and len(task.review_notes) > 0
    
    def _transition_to_revision(self, task: ContentTask) -> ContentTask:
        task.revision_count += 1
        task.current_stage = ContentStage.REVISION
        return task
    
    def _transition_to_publish(self, task: ContentTask) -> ContentTask:
        task.current_stage = ContentStage.PUBLISH
        return task
    
    def _apply_result(self, task: ContentTask, result: dict) -> ContentTask:
        if ContentStage.RESEARCH:
            task.research_context = result.get("research")
            task.current_stage = ContentStage.DRAFT
        elif ContentStage.DRAFT:
            task.draft_content = result.get("draft")
            task.current_stage = ContentStage.REVIEW
        elif ContentStage.REVIEW:
            task.review_notes = result.get("notes")
            task.current_stage = ContentStage.REVIEW
        return task

Quality Gates

Human reviewers approve content before publication. Automated quality scoring complements human review, flagging content that exceeds acceptable plagiarism scores, factuality issues, or brand voice violations.

EXERCISE

Extend the content team to include a Fact-Checking Agent that validates claims against a knowledge base before the Editor stage, integrating verification results into the review notes.

← Chapter 20
Production Deployment
Chapter 22 →
Research Agent Team