What can Razer Blade 16 (2025, RTX 5090 Mobile) run for agents?

Build: Razer Blade 16 (2025, RTX 5090 Mobile 24GB)

Memory: 24 GB VRAM + 64 GB system RAM
Runner: llama.cpp / Ollama (CUDA)

Runs comfortably
120 models

Ranked by fit for agents use case + predicted speed. Click a row for VRAM breakdown.

#1Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 8B
8B
hermes
Commercial OK
Quant: Q8_0Context: 8,192VRAM: 14.7 GBHeadroom: 9.3 GB
ollama run hermes3:8b
73
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
8.50 GB
KV cache
4.00 GB
Activations
0.43 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#2Qwen 2.5 14B Instruct
14B
qwen
Commercial OK
Quant: Q5_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 19.8 GBHeadroom: 4.2 GB
ollama run qwen2.5:14b
64
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
10.50 GB
KV cache
7.00 GB
Activations
0.53 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#3Dolphin 3.0 Mistral 24B
24B
dolphin
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 2,048VRAM: 19.5 GBHeadroom: 4.5 GB
ollama run dolphin-mistral:24b
43
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
14.00 GB
KV cache
3.00 GB
Activations
0.70 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#4Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct
7B
qwen
Commercial OK
Quant: Q8_0Context: 8,192VRAM: 10.8 GBHeadroom: 13.2 GB
ollama run qwen2.5:7b
83
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
8.10 GB
KV cache
0.47 GB
Activations
0.41 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#5Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B
8B
llama
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 11.0 GBHeadroom: 13.0 GB
128
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
4.90 GB
KV cache
4.00 GB
Activations
0.25 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#6Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3
7B
mistral
Commercial OK
Quant: Q5_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 10.7 GBHeadroom: 13.3 GB
ollama run mistral:7b
128
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
5.10 GB
KV cache
3.50 GB
Activations
0.26 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#7Ornith 1.0 9B
9B
other
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 12.2 GBHeadroom: 11.8 GB
ollama run ornith:9b
114
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
5.60 GB
KV cache
4.50 GB
Activations
0.29 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#8Mellum2 12B-A2.5B
12.15B
other
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 16.3 GBHeadroom: 7.7 GB
ollama run hf.co/JetBrains/Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking-GGUF-Q4_K_M
84
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
8.00 GB
KV cache
6.08 GB
Activations
0.41 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#9Mistral Small 3 24B
24B
mistral
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 2,048VRAM: 19.5 GBHeadroom: 4.5 GB
ollama run mistral-small:24b
43
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
14.00 GB
KV cache
3.00 GB
Activations
0.70 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#10Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
8B
llama
Commercial OK
Quant: FP16Context: 8,192VRAM: 19.8 GBHeadroom: 4.2 GB
ollama run llama3.1:8b
39
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
16.10 GB
KV cache
1.07 GB
Activations
0.81 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#11Dolphin 3.0 8B
8B
dolphin
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 11.1 GBHeadroom: 12.9 GB
ollama run dolphin3:8b
128
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
5.00 GB
KV cache
4.00 GB
Activations
0.26 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
#12Qwen 3 14B
14B
qwen
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 17.6 GBHeadroom: 6.4 GB
ollama run qwen3:14b
73
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
8.40 GB
KV cache
7.00 GB
Activations
0.43 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB

Runs with tradeoffs
73 models

Tight VRAM, partial CPU offload, or context-limited.

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
32B
qwen
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 23.9 GBHeadroom: 0.1 GB
  • Tight VRAM fit — only 0.1 GB headroom left for context growth
ollama run qwen2.5-coder:32b
32
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
19.00 GB
KV cache
2.15 GB
Activations
0.96 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
Gemma 4 26B MoE
26B
gemma
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 2,048VRAM: 21.9 GBHeadroom: 2.1 GB
  • Tight VRAM fit — only 2.1 GB headroom left for context growth
ollama run gemma4:26b-moe
39
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
16.00 GB
KV cache
3.25 GB
Activations
0.80 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B
30B
qwen
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 36.8 GBHeadroom: 25.6 GB
  • Partial CPU offload: ~35% of layers run on CPU
  • CPU is the bottleneck — upgrading RAM bandwidth helps more than VRAM here
ollama run qwen3-coder:30b
4
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
19.00 GB
KV cache
15.00 GB
Activations
0.96 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
North Mini Code 1.0
30B
other
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 36.8 GBHeadroom: 25.6 GB
  • Partial CPU offload: ~35% of layers run on CPU
  • CPU is the bottleneck — upgrading RAM bandwidth helps more than VRAM here
ollama run north-mini-code-1.0
4
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
19.00 GB
KV cache
15.00 GB
Activations
0.96 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
GLM-4.7-Flash
31B
glm
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 37.3 GBHeadroom: 25.1 GB
  • Partial CPU offload: ~36% of layers run on CPU
  • CPU is the bottleneck — upgrading RAM bandwidth helps more than VRAM here
ollama run glm-4.7-flash
4
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
19.00 GB
KV cache
15.50 GB
Activations
0.96 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
Laguna XS 2.1
33B
other
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 39.3 GBHeadroom: 23.1 GB
  • Partial CPU offload: ~39% of layers run on CPU
  • CPU is the bottleneck — upgrading RAM bandwidth helps more than VRAM here
ollama run laguna-xs-2.1
3
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
20.00 GB
KV cache
16.50 GB
Activations
1.01 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
Ornith 1.0 35B
35B
other
Commercial OK
Quant: Q4_K_MContext: 8,192VRAM: 41.4 GBHeadroom: 21.0 GB
  • Partial CPU offload: ~42% of layers run on CPU
  • CPU is the bottleneck — upgrading RAM bandwidth helps more than VRAM here
ollama run ornith:35b
3
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
21.00 GB
KV cache
17.50 GB
Activations
1.06 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB
Qwen 3 30B-A3B
30B
qwen
Commercial OK
Quant: Q8_0Context: 8,192VRAM: 50.4 GBHeadroom: 12.0 GB
  • Partial CPU offload: ~52% of layers run on CPU
  • CPU is the bottleneck — upgrading RAM bandwidth helps more than VRAM here
ollama run qwen3:30b
2
tok/s
Estimated
Weights
32.00 GB
KV cache
15.00 GB
Activations
1.61 GB
Runtime
1.80 GB

What if you upgraded?

Hypothetical scenarios. We re-ran the compatibility engine for each.

+32 GB system RAM

~$80–150

Doubles your CPU-offload working set. Helps when models don't quite fit in VRAM.

Unlocks: 64 new comfortable, 79 new tradeoff

  • Qwen 3 0.6B
  • Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
  • Qwen 3 1.7B
  • Gemma 3 270M

Upgrade to NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

see current pricing

32 GB VRAM (vs your 24 GB) plus a bandwidth jump from ~? GB/s to ~896 GB/s.

Unlocks: 103 new comfortable

  • Qwen 3 0.6B
  • Qwen 3 30B-A3B
  • Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
  • Qwen3.6 27B

Add a second Razer Blade 16 (2025, RTX 5090 Mobile)

see current pricing

Tensor parallelism splits the model across both cards, effectively doubling VRAM. Bandwidth doesn't double — runs ~1.5× the single-card speed in practice.

Unlocks: 116 new comfortable

  • Qwen 3 0.6B
  • Qwen 3 30B-A3B
  • Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
  • Qwen3.6 27B

Some links above are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. How we make money.

Won't run
top 5 popular models

Need more memory than you have. Shown for orientation.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T MoE)
1600B
deepseek
Commercial OK

Even with CPU offload, needs more memory than your VRAM (24 GB) + 60% of system RAM (38 GB) combined.

Qwen 3.5 235B-A17B (MoE)
397B
qwen
Commercial OK

Even with CPU offload, needs more memory than your VRAM (24 GB) + 60% of system RAM (38 GB) combined.

Qwen 3 235B-A22B
235B
qwen
Commercial OK

Even with CPU offload, needs more memory than your VRAM (24 GB) + 60% of system RAM (38 GB) combined.

DeepSeek R1 (671B reasoning)
671B
deepseek
Commercial OK

Even with CPU offload, needs more memory than your VRAM (24 GB) + 60% of system RAM (38 GB) combined.

Llama 4 Scout
109B
llama
Commercial OK

Even with CPU offload, needs more memory than your VRAM (24 GB) + 60% of system RAM (38 GB) combined.

How to read these numbers

Measured here
Measured here - RunLocalAI ran this exact combo on owner hardware with public evidence.

Source-backed
Source-backed / community - a reproduced public source supports the speed, but it is not labeled as owner-measured.

Extrapolated
Extrapolated - predicted from a measured benchmark on similar-bandwidth hardware.

Estimated
Estimated - formula based on VRAM bandwidth and model architecture; not a benchmark row.

RunLocalAI Will-It-Run Framework →

Want a specific benchmark we don't have? Email Contact support and we'll prioritize it.