command-r
104B parameters
Restricted
Reviewed November 2026

Command R+ (Aug 2024)

Cohere's August 2024 Command R+ refresh. RAG-optimized; non-commercial license. Strong tool-calling and citation discipline.

License: CC-BY-NC-4.0·Released Aug 30, 2024·Context: 131,072 tokens
BLK · VERDICT

Our verdict

OP · Eruo Fredoline|UPDATED NOV 8, 2026
Not tested by usEditorial assessment from specifications and published reports.
unrated

Positioning

Cohere Command R+ (08-2024) is the open-weight refresh of Cohere's flagship retrieval-augmented model and one of the few 100B+ class open-weight models with explicit RAG / tool-use tuning. 104 billion parameters dense, 128K context, released under a research-and-non-commercial license (CC-BY-NC-4.0 + Cohere Acceptable Use). Cohere says the 08-2024 update improved decisions on whether to use a tool, following of system-message instructions, and structured data analysis. The model was trained on 23 languages and evaluated on 10, including Arabic and Korean.

Strengths

  • Retrieval grounding is a genuine differentiator. Command R+ was trained with explicit RAG document-citation as a first-class capability — citation accuracy on multi-document QA is meaningfully better than equal-parameter Llama 3 / Qwen 3 models that bolt RAG on after training.
  • Multilingual coverage is real. Genuinely useful for Arabic, Korean, Hebrew, Indonesian, Vietnamese — languages where Llama 3 lags.
  • Tool-use is well-tuned. Function calling + multi-step tool use shows up clearly in agentic benchmarks.
  • 128K context with stable degradation curve. Performance at 64K-128K context is closer to short-context performance than typical 100B-class models.

Limitations

  • License is non-commercial. CC-BY-NC-4.0 + Cohere AUP — production commercial deployments require Cohere licensing. This is the single biggest practical limitation vs Llama 3.3 / Qwen 3 (which ship under permissive open-weight licenses).
  • Compute requirements are real. 104B FP16 needs ~210 GB; 104B Q4 needs ~55-60 GB. Won't fit a single consumer GPU. MI300X / PRO 6000 Blackwell / Mac Studio M3 Ultra is the floor.
  • Reasoning is not class-leading. DeepSeek V3 and Qwen 3 Reasoning beat Command R+ on math/code/logic benchmarks.
  • Multi-tenant serving is a cluster job. Production multi-tenant serving needs proper serving stack on H100/H200 cluster.

Real-world performance

  • Llama 3 70B vs Command R+ 104B: Llama 3 70B is faster (smaller, better optimized) and equally capable on English-only tasks. Command R+ wins clearly on multilingual + RAG citation + tool-use chains.
  • Qwen 3 235B-A22B MoE vs Command R+ 104B dense: Qwen 3 235B is faster (MoE active params ~22B) and stronger on reasoning. Command R+ wins on retrieval grounding + multilingual.
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet via API vs Command R+ self-hosted: API is faster and stronger on most tasks but data sovereignty + RAG + on-prem deployment is impossible. Pick by deployment requirements.

Should you run this locally?

Yes if you specifically need on-prem multilingual RAG at the 100B-class capability tier and your deployment context is research / non-commercial / Cohere-licensed. Production-grade RAG with strong citation accuracy is genuinely a Command R+ strength. Pick Mac Studio M3 Ultra (256 GB) or MI300X (192 GB) for single-card deployment.

No if you need permissive open-weight licensing (pick Llama 3.3 70B or Qwen 3 235B-A22B), reasoning-heavy workloads (pick DeepSeek V3 / Qwen 3 Reasoning), or production at scale where commercial licensing cost beats self-hosting math.

How it compares

  • vs Llama 3.3 70B: Smaller, faster, permissive license. Llama wins for production commercial; Command R+ wins for multilingual RAG.
  • vs Qwen 3 235B-A22B: Larger params + stronger reasoning + permissive license. Qwen 3 wins on most metrics; Command R+ wins on retrieval grounding citation accuracy.
  • vs DeepSeek V3 (671B MoE): DeepSeek V3 is dramatically larger MoE with stronger reasoning. Command R+ wins on dense-model deployment simplicity.
  • vs command-r-35b: Smaller Cohere sibling — same retrieval focus at lower parameter count. Pick R+ for full capability, R for cheaper inference.

Run this yourself

  • Single-card workstation: PRO 6000 Blackwell (96 GB) at Q4, with about 33 GB left after the 63 GB weights.
  • Single-card AMD: MI300X (192 GB) at FP8, about 104 GB of weights. FP16 at about 208 GB does not fit.
  • Mac Studio: Mac Studio M3 Ultra (256 GB) at FP16 via MLX or llama.cpp Metal.
  • Datacenter: 2× H100 PCIe NVLinked at FP8 production serving.

Overview

Cohere's August 2024 Command R+ refresh. RAG-optimized; non-commercial license. Strong tool-calling and citation discipline.

Family & lineage

How this model relates to others in its lineage. Family members share architecture and training-data roots; parent / children edges record direct distillation or fine-tune relationships.

Family siblings (command-r)

Strengths

  • Strongest open RAG-tuned model in 2024
  • Citation discipline

Weaknesses

  • Non-commercial license blocks production deployment

Quantization variants

Each quantization trades model quality for file size and VRAM. Q4_K_M is the most popular starting point.

QuantizationFile sizeVRAM required
AWQ-INT452.0 GB72 GB
Rent instead
Too big for a 32 GB card? Rent a GPU by the hour

At Q4 Command R+ (Aug 2024) needs about 94 GB of memory by our estimate, more than a 32 GB graphics card holds. Renting a GPU with enough memory (or several GPUs) by the hour is the practical way to try it before you plan hardware for it.

Referral links: RunLocalAI may earn a commission or account credits if you sign up and rent, at no extra cost to you. Hourly rates and which GPUs are listed change all the time, so check the provider's page before you start. How we make money.

Get the model

HuggingFace

Original weights

huggingface.co/CohereLabs/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024

Source repository — direct quantization required.

Hardware that runs this

Cards with enough VRAM for at least one quantization of Command R+ (Aug 2024).

Compare alternatives

Models worth comparing

Same parameter band, plus what's one tier above and below — so you can decide what actually fits your hardware.

Step up
More capable — bigger memory footprint
No verdicted models in the next tier up yet.

Frequently asked

What's the minimum VRAM to run Command R+ (Aug 2024)?

72GB of VRAM is enough to run Command R+ (Aug 2024) at the AWQ-INT4 quantization (file size 52.0 GB). Higher-quality quantizations need more.

Can I use Command R+ (Aug 2024) commercially?

Command R+ (Aug 2024) is released under the CC-BY-NC-4.0, which has restrictions for commercial use. Review the license terms before using it in a product.

What's the context length of Command R+ (Aug 2024)?

Command R+ (Aug 2024) supports a context window of 131,072 tokens (about 131K).

Source: huggingface.co/CohereLabs/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024

Reviewed by RunLocalAI Editorial. See our editorial policy for how we research and verify model claims.

Related — keep moving

Before you buy

Verify Command R+ (Aug 2024) runs on your specific hardware before committing money.