NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
Spec-driven comparison from our catalog. For curated editorial verdicts on the most-asked pairs, see the head-to-head index.
Editorial verdict available: We have a hand-written buyer guide for this exact pair. Read the editorial verdict →
Pick your two cards
Spec matrix
| Dimension | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16 GB mid (13B-32B Q4; 70B Q4 short ctx) | 16 GB mid (13B-32B Q4; 70B Q4 short ctx) |
| Memory bandwidth | — — | 960 GB/s strong (800 GB/s - 1.5 TB/s) |
| FP16 compute | — | 56 TFLOPS |
| FP8 compute | — | 112 TFLOPS |
| Power draw | 300 W enthusiast (850W PSU) | 360 W enthusiast (850W PSU) |
| Price | ~$849 (street) | ~$1,199 (street) |
| Release year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Vendor | nvidia | nvidia |
| Runtime support | CUDA, Vulkan | CUDA, Vulkan |
Spec data from our hardware catalog. This is a generated spec compare, not a hand-written editorial verdict. For editorial picks on the most-asked pairs, see our curated head-to-heads.
Biggest buyer mistake on this comparison
Buying based on the spec sheet without verifying the actual workload requirement. Run /will-it-run with your specific model + context-length combination before committing — the math is exact and frequently surprising.
Workload fit
How each card handles common local AI workloads. “Tie” means both cards meet the bar; pick on other axes (price, ecosystem, form factor).
| Workload | Winner | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Coding agents (Aider, Cursor, Continue) | Tie | Code agents need 16 GB minimum for 13B-32B Q4. Below that, latency degrades from offloading. |
| Ollama / LM Studio chat | Tie | Both run Ollama fine. 16 GB unlocks multi-model serving via OLLAMA_KEEP_ALIVE. |
| Image generation (SDXL, Flux Dev) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 | Image gen is compute-bound. 16 GB fits SDXL + Flux Dev FP8 with care; LoRA training tight. |
| Local RAG (embedding + LLM) | Tie | RAG with 13B-class LLM fits at 16 GB. 70B LLM RAG needs 24+ GB. |
| Long-context chat (32K+ context) | Neither fits | 16 GB is tight for long context — KV cache eats VRAM linearly with context length. |
| Voice / Whisper transcription | Tie | Whisper Large V3 fits in 4-8 GB. Both cards likely overkill for transcription-only workloads. |
| Video generation (LTX-Video, Mochi) | Neither fits | Below 24 GB, local video gen isn't realistic with current models. |
| Multi-GPU tensor parallel (vLLM, ExLlamaV2) | Tie | Tensor-parallel scaling works on PCIe 4.0 x8/x16. Used cards typically win on $/GB-VRAM at scale (dual 3090 vs single 5090). |
VRAM reality check
- Multi-GPU does NOT pool VRAM by default. Two 24 GB cards = 48 GB combined ONLY when the runtime supports tensor-parallel inference (vLLM, ExLlamaV2, llama.cpp split-mode). For models that don't tensor-parallel cleanly, you're stuck at single-card VRAM.
- At 16 GB, 13-32B Q4 fits comfortably. 70B Q4 fits at very short context (~2K) — usable for benchmarking but not for agent workflows. Plan for the 24 GB tier if 70B is your roadmap.
Power, noise, and thermals
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti TDP: 300W. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 TDP: 360W. Both fit standard ATX builds with 750-850W PSUs.
Upgrade-path logic
- If you already own the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a side-grade — same VRAM tier means same workload ceiling. Only upgrade if you specifically need newer architecture features (FP8 native, FlashAttention 3, warranty refresh).
Better alternatives to consider
If 16 GB is your ceiling, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at $450-550 is the value floor for that tier.
Both cards in your comparison are current-gen new silicon. Used 3090 covers the same workload class at lower cost — worth checking before committing.
Quick takes
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
16GB Blackwell at the upper-mid price tier. Strong 14B–32B model performance.
Full verdict →NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
Second-tier Blackwell. 16GB GDDR7, ~960 GB/s bandwidth. Fastest 16GB consumer card on the market.
Full verdict →